Why are therapy lights so expensive?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:54

Why are therapy lights so expensive?

I’ve been in the market for a red light therapy device and, like many of you, I’m dismayed by the pricing on every product that’s actually legitimate.

It’s AFFORDABLE at just $40 for the bulb+cord+power switch itself

It has its pros and cons but the pros vastly outweigh the cons in my opinion…

What happens if you listen to loud music while you sleep through earbuds every night (about 8 hours)? How will this affect your hearing? Will it decline fast?

Cons:

After a ton of research, I decided to buy the “Hooga HG24 bulb” with the cord and I also purchased a stand separately. Grand total: $60.

Pros:

Fervo Energy lands $206M in financing to build massive geothermal power plant - TechCrunch

Yes, there’s a huge difference in total number of LEDs, but to put it in context, the Solawave has about five and this bulb has 12. The ones on this bulb are BIG. It casts light on my entire face when I’m up close.

3-year warranty, 60-day satisfaction guarantee

Hooga is a reputable Red Light seller

What are the top AI business ideas for beginners?

It has the very close technical specifications to the Omniluxe (Bulb 650 nm 850 ni, Omniluxe 630 nm 830 ni) MINUS the number of lights

Hope this helps others :)

Slightly less convenient for facial use since it doesn’t conform to your face and you have to be somewhat stationary with the bulb.

Do you think Keir Starmer is the "party of hope" in the UK?

Number of lights (bulb: 12, Omniluxe 60)

Comes with eye guards

Comes with a cord attached so it’s basically its own complete lamp when you buy the stand

Why are terrible, boring art pieces done by famous people worth so much while beautiful pieces done by amateurs are worthless?

You can shine the bulb anywhere on your body (beauty-specific masks are limiting). I’ll be treating my face as well as my alopecia areata on the top of my head.

It’s approved by the FDA as level II medical device (reminder, this means the FDA endorses it as safe, not that they are vouching for its efficacy)